Fall Economic Statement 2018: Text Version

Introduction

Figure 1

Mandate Letter Commitments (November 2015)
  Total
Completed - fully met 95
Completed - modified 2
Actions taken, progress made 157
Action taken - progress made towards ongoing goal 19
Action taken - progress made, facing challenges 13
Not being pursued 3

Return to report - Figure 1

Chapter 1

Chart 1.3a

Change in Working-Age Employment Rate From 2016 to 2018
  Percentage points
Total Canadian employment rate 1.1
Highschool diploma or below 1.0
Youth 15 to 24 years 1.2
Single mothers with young children 2.1
Off-reserve Indigenous Peoples 2.6
Recent immigrants 3.3

Return to report - Chart 1.3a

Chart 1.3b

Median Weekly Earnings Growth From 2016 to 2018, by Income Groups
  Overall Up to $495 $495 to $740 $740 to $1,000 $1,000 to $1,440 $1,440 and above
Per cent 6.5 10.9 6.9 5.5 4.0 2.8

Notes: Compares January-October 2016 to January-October 2018, as October 2018 is the latest month for which data are available. Data are not seasonally adjusted. Working-age is defined as 25-64 years old. Data are for off-reserve Indigenous Peoples. "Single mothers with young children" denotes single mothers with the youngest child less than 13 years. "Recent immigrants" are immigrants who landed in the last 10 years. Data are not available for other vulnerable groups such as Indigenous Peoples on-reserve, LGBTQ2+ people or persons with disabilities.
Sources: Statistics Canada; Department of Finance Canada calculations.

Return to report - Chart 1.3b

Chart 1.4a

This chart shows the joint evolution of consumer confidence and growth in average weekly earnings from January 2015 to October 2018 for Canada. Consumer confidence is shown as an index, where the year 2014 equals 100. Average weekly earnings is expressed as year-over-year growth. Both series are highly correlated, decreasing in 2015 and up to mid-2016 for average weekly earnings, then increasing in 2017. Growth in average weekly earnings has plateaued since the beginning of 2018 and consumer confidence has somewhat declined over the latest months.

Return to report - Chart 1.4a

Chart 1.4b

Real Household Consumption and Real GDP Growth
Per cent, year over year
  Real consumption Real GDP
2007 Q1 3.97 1.36
2007 Q2 4.59 2.28
2007 Q3 4.42 2.43
2007 Q4 5.23 2.18
2008 Q1 5.12 1.59
2008 Q2 3.68 0.96
2008 Q3 2.78 1.39
2008 Q4 -0.27 0.07
2009 Q1 -1.39 -2.27
2009 Q2 -0.65 -3.68
2009 Q3 0.36 -4.05
2009 Q4 2.30 -1.78
2010 Q1 3.79 1.72
2010 Q2 3.78 3.38
2010 Q3 3.50 3.65
2010 Q4 3.73 3.60
2011 Q1 2.76 3.13
2011 Q2 2.37 2.80
2011 Q3 1.97 3.49
2011 Q4 1.69 3.14
2012 Q1 2.10 2.42
2012 Q2 1.75 2.56
2012 Q3 1.95 1.35
2012 Q4 1.86 0.68
2013 Q1 1.90 1.69
2013 Q2 2.68 2.01
2013 Q3 2.82 2.64
2013 Q4 2.92 3.55
2014 Q1 2.63 2.62
2014 Q2 2.73 3.18
2014 Q3 2.70 3.09
2014 Q4 2.76 2.53
2015 Q1 2.53 2.19
2015 Q2 1.97 0.84
2015 Q3 1.98 0.67
2015 Q4 1.92 0.32
2016 Q1 2.22 1.14
2016 Q2 2.30 1.03
2016 Q3 2.35 1.51
2016 Q4 2.57 1.97
2017 Q1 3.16 2.35
2017 Q2 3.71 3.77
2017 Q3 3.70 3.11
2017 Q4 3.37 2.97
2018 Q1 2.63 2.33
2018 Q2 2.21 1.91

Note: Last data points are 2018Q2.
Source: Statistics Canada.

Return to report - Chart 1.4b

Chart 1.5b

Contributions to Real Business Investment Growth, By Component
Percentage points, year over year
  Total business investment Non-residential structures Machinery and equipment Intellectual property products
2013 Q1 5.39 5.61 0.47 -0.70
2013 Q2 3.90 3.94 0.22 -0.33
2013 Q3 4.36 4.96 -0.36 -0.28
2013 Q4 3.98 3.68 0.39 -0.09
2014 Q1 3.58 3.93 -0.31 -0.01
2014 Q2 3.76 3.56 0.07 0.13
2014 Q3 4.10 3.06 1.20 -0.16
2014 Q4 4.96 3.64 1.08 0.25
2015 Q1 -5.03 -3.85 -0.13 -1.09
2015 Q2 -8.87 -6.46 -1.40 -1.06
2015 Q3 -13.34 -9.07 -3.08 -1.23
2015 Q4 -16.06 -11.82 -2.92 -1.44
2016 Q1 -11.56 -8.67 -2.26 -0.74
2016 Q2 -9.82 -8.25 -1.12 -0.57
2016 Q3 -5.49 -2.99 -1.56 -0.99
2016 Q4 -8.59 -4.40 -2.69 -1.50
2017 Q1 -1.97 -1.53 0.26 -0.70
2017 Q2 1.41 1.09 0.73 -0.41
2017 Q3 2.20 -1.27 2.75 0.69
2017 Q4 8.71 3.29 4.27 1.17
2018 Q1 8.20 3.52 3.46 1.25
2018 Q2 6.74 2.91 2.85 1.02

Notes: Average of annualized quarterly growth rate.
Last observation is 2018Q2.
Sources: Statistics Canada; Department of Finance Canada calculations.

Return to report - Chart 1.5b

Chart 1.8a

OECD Unemployment Rate
  Per cent
2000 Q1 6.26
2000 Q2 6.08
2000 Q3 6.01
2000 Q4 5.93
2001 Q1 6.00
2001 Q2 6.12
2001 Q3 6.32
2001 Q4 6.63
2002 Q1 6.74
2002 Q2 6.81
2002 Q3 6.82
2002 Q4 6.87
2003 Q1 6.90
2003 Q2 7.03
2003 Q3 7.07
2003 Q4 7.00
2004 Q1 6.97
2004 Q2 6.91
2004 Q3 6.85
2004 Q4 6.77
2005 Q1 6.69
2005 Q2 6.67
2005 Q3 6.54
2005 Q4 6.50
2006 Q1 6.29
2006 Q2 6.13
2006 Q3 6.04
2006 Q4 5.85
2007 Q1 5.75
2007 Q2 5.59
2007 Q3 5.60
2007 Q4 5.59
2008 Q1 5.58
2008 Q2 5.71
2008 Q3 6.00
2008 Q4 6.54
2009 Q1 7.52
2009 Q2 8.18
2009 Q3 8.41
2009 Q4 8.45
2010 Q1 8.47
2010 Q2 8.36
2010 Q3 8.25
2010 Q4 8.22
2011 Q1 7.98
2011 Q2 7.96
2011 Q3 7.97
2011 Q4 7.96
2012 Q1 7.92
2012 Q2 7.96
2012 Q3 7.96
2012 Q4 8.01
2013 Q1 8.07
2013 Q2 7.99
2013 Q3 7.87
2013 Q4 7.71
2014 Q1 7.58
2014 Q2 7.38
2014 Q3 7.32
2014 Q4 7.13
2015 Q1 6.98
2015 Q2 6.87
2015 Q3 6.68
2015 Q4 6.56
2016 Q1 6.45
2016 Q2 6.36
2016 Q3 6.32
2016 Q4 6.20
2017 Q1 6.04
2017 Q2 5.82
2017 Q3 5.71
2017 Q4 5.52
2018 Q1 5.45
2018 Q2 5.39

Sources: OECD Economic Outlook, May 2018.

Return to report - Chart 1.8a

Chart 1.8b

OECD Leading Indicator %, year-over-year
  OECD U.S. Euro Area Japan
2015.01 2.1 2.4 1.1 0.0
2015.02 2.1 2.2 1.2 0.2
2015.03 2.1 2.1 1.3 0.5
2015.04 2.0 1.9 1.3 0.8
2015.05 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.1
2015.06 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.3
2015.07 1.9 1.4 1.6 1.4
2015.08 1.8 1.2 1.7 1.4
2015.09 1.7 1.0 1.8 1.3
2015.10 1.6 0.9 1.9 1.2
2015.11 1.5 0.8 1.8 1.1
2015.12 1.5 0.7 1.8 0.9
2016.01 1.4 0.7 1.7 0.8
2016.02 1.4 0.7 1.5 0.7
2016.03 1.3 0.7 1.4 0.6
2016.04 1.4 0.8 1.3 0.5
2016.05 1.5 0.9 1.3 0.4
2016.06 1.6 1.1 1.3 0.4
2016.07 1.7 1.2 1.3 0.5
2016.08 1.8 1.4 1.3 0.6
2016.09 2.0 1.7 1.4 0.8
2016.10 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.0
2016.11 2.3 2.2 1.6 1.3
2016.12 2.4 2.5 1.7 1.4
2017.01 2.6 2.7 1.8 1.6
2017.02 2.7 2.9 2.0 1.7
2017.03 2.8 2.9 2.1 1.8
2017.04 2.9 2.9 2.3 1.9
2017.05 2.9 2.9 2.4 2.0
2017.06 3.0 3.0 2.6 2.0
2017.07 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.0
2017.08 3.0 3.0 2.8 1.9
2017.09 3.0 3.0 2.8 1.9
2017.10 2.9 3.0 2.8 1.8
2017.11 2.9 2.9 2.8 1.7
2017.12 2.8 2.8 2.7 1.6
2018.01 2.7 2.8 2.5 1.4
2018.02 2.6 2.8 2.4 1.3
2018.03 2.4 2.8 2.2 1.2
2018.04 2.3 2.8 2.0 1.1
2018.05 2.1 2.7 1.7 1.1
2018.06 2.0 2.7 1.5 1.0

Notes: Trend-restored is one version of the OECD's leading indicators, designed to give a proxy for GDP growth. Last data point is June 2018.
Source: OECD composite leading indicator.

Return to report - Chart 1.8b

Chart 1.10a

The bar chart shows the appreciation from the beginning of 2018 to November 15 of the U.S. dollar versus seven emerging market economy (EMEs) currencies: Argentina, Turkey, Brazil, Russia, South Africa, India and Indonesia.

The U.S. dollar has appreciated the most against Argentina (over 90 per cent) and Turkey (over 40 per cent), followed by (in order) Brazil, Russia, South Africa, India and Indonesia (in a range of just under 10 per cent to just above 15 per cent).

Return to report - Chart 1.10a

Chart 1.10b

Real World Merchandise Trade Growth
  Per cent, year over year
2012 Q1 0.5
2012 Q2 2.1
2012 Q3 1.3
2012 Q4 1.4
2013 Q1 2.4
2013 Q2 1.8
2013 Q3 1.9
2013 Q4 3.0
2014 Q1 2.4
2014 Q2 2.4
2014 Q3 3.2
2014 Q4 3.3
2015 Q1 3.0
2015 Q2 1.8
2015 Q3 1.6
2015 Q4 1.1
2016 Q1 0.5
2016 Q2 1.8
2016 Q3 1.3
2016 Q4 2.4
2017 Q1 4.2
2017 Q2 4.4
2017 Q3 5.2
2017 Q4 4.8
2018 Q1 4.2
2018 Q2 3.6
Note: Last data point is 2018Q2.
Sources: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, CPB World Trade Monitor August 2018; Department of Finance Canada calculations.

Return to report - Chart 1.10b

Chart 1.11b

Goods Exports to Emerging Economies as a Share of Total Exports, 2017
  Per cent of total exports
Canada 11
United Kingdom 23
France 25
Italy 29
Germany 29
Japan 43
United States 45

Sources: United Nations Comtrade database; International Monetary Fund.

Return to report - Chart 1.11b

Chart 1.12

The chart shows the evolution of the price differential between West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil and the Canadian Effective Price (CEP) from January 2012 to early November 2018. This differential is generally volatile over the 2012 through 2015 period, before broadly stabilising near US$10 per barrel between late 2015 and late 2017. Since late 2017, the differential has risen sharply to the US$40-range. The chart also shows the volume of crude oil exported by rail on a separate axis. This line shows that exports of oil by rail have trended up steadily since early 2016 and currently sit at a record high over 200,000 barrels per day.

Return to report - Chart 1.12

Chapter 2

Chart 2.1

Reduction in Poverty, Canada's Official Poverty Line, 2011-2019
  Incidence of poverty (%)
2011 12.7
2012 12.7
2013 12.1
2014 11.3
2015 12.1
2016 10.6

Note: The chart shows a downward-sloping straight line to illustrate the expected trend towards the 2020 Poverty Reduction Strategy target of 9.7%. Poverty reduction impacts for CCB, GIS and CWB based on microsimulation model estimates.

Sources: Canadian Income Survey, 2011 to 2016 actual figures, Market Basket Measure.

By 2017, the Canada Child Benefit (CCB) will have helped lift 521,000 people out of poverty.

By 2017, the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) top-up will have helped lift 57,000 people out of poverty.

In total, Government investments will help lift 652,000 people out of poverty.

By 2019, the introduction of the Canada Workers Benefit (CWB) will help lift 74,000 people out of poverty.

Return to report - Chart 2.1

National Housing Strategy Targets

100,000+ new housing units created

385,000 community housing units protected + 50,000 created

530,000 households removed from housing need

300,000 households supported with a Canada Housing Benefit

50 % decrease in chronic homelessness

300,000 existing housing units repaired and renewed

7,000 shelter spaces created or repaired for survivors of family violence

Return to report - National Housing Strategy Targets

Chart 2.2

Estimated Reduction in the Percentage of Families at Risk of Not Having Sufficient Retirement Income, by Income Quintile
  Estimated Reduction (per cent)
1st quintile 10 to 8
2nd quintile 25 to 18
3rd quintile 31 to 22
4th quintile 28 to 22
5th quintile 25 to 20
All families 24 to 18

Notes: Chart shows the estimated impact of the CPP enhancement if it was fully mature today (i.e., workers had contributed to the enhanced Plan over their full careers). Figures represent the share of families nearing retirement age at risk of not replacing 60 per cent of their pre-retirement after-tax income when considering income from the three pillars of the retirement income system and savings from other financial and non-financial assets. Income quintiles correspond to pre-retirement after-tax income of families with a major income earner age 45-59. The 1st quintile corresponds to the bottom 20% of families in the income distribution while the 5th quintile corresponds to the top 20% of families.
Sources: Survey of Financial Security, 2012; Department of Finance Canada calculations.

Return to report - Chart 2.2

Chapter 3

Investing in Canadians

Middle class tax cut
Canada Child Benefit
Enhanced Canada Pension Plan
Guaranteed Income Supplement
Canada Workers Benefit
More flexible and inclusive Employment Insurance benefits

Investing to create long-term growth

Strategic Infrastructure

Investing in:

Skills and Training

Investing in:

Innovation and Science

Investing in:

Trade and Foreign Investment

Investing in:

Competitiveness

Investing in:

Return to report - Investing in Canadians

Chart 3.1a

This chart shows the evolution of the total government deficit in the U.S. and Canada, as a share of GDP, between 2010 and 2023. The data are provided by the International Monetary Fund in the World Economic Outlook, using actual data from 2010 to 2017, and projections from 2017 to 2023. The chart shows that compared to Canada, the U.S. has consistently had much higher total government deficits as a share of GDP since 2010. In 2010, the total government deficit as a share of GDP was 10.6 per cent in the U.S. compared to 4.7 per cent in Canada and in 2017, it was 3.8 per cent in the U.S. compared to 1.1 per cent in Canada. This is projected to continue until the end of the forecasted period, where the total government deficit as a share of GDP in 2023 is projected to be 4.5 per cent in the U.S. compared to 0.9 per cent in Canada.

Return to report - Chart 3.1a

Chart 3.1b

This chart shows the evolution of the total government net debt in the U.S. and Canada, as a share of GDP, between 2010 and 2023. The data are provided by the International Monetary Fund in the World Economic Outlook, using actual data from 2010 to 2017, and projections from 2017 to 2023. The chart shows that compared to Canada, the U.S. has consistently had much higher total government net debt as a share of GDP since 2010. In 2010, total government net debt as a share of GDP was 70.0 per cent in the U.S. compared to 26.8 per cent in Canada in 2010 and in 2017, it was 78.8 per cent in the U.S. compared to 27.7 per cent in Canada in 2017. This is projected to continue until the end of the forecasted period, where the total government net debt as a share of GDP in 2023 is projected to be 83.7 per cent in the U.S. compared to 25.3 per cent in Canada.

Return to report - Chart 3.1b

Chart 3.2

This chart shows the evolution of after-tax corporate profit margins between 1997 and 2018. The data are derived from the Quarterly Survey of Financial Statements available on Statistics Canada. The chart shows that after-tax corporate profit margins rose from 4.2 per cent in 1997 to a high of 8.1 per cent in 2017.

Return to report - Chart 3.2

Chart 3.3a

Tax Burden in G7 countries, 2016
  Tax revenues as a per cent of GDP
United States 26.0
Japan 30.7
Canada 31.7
United Kingdom 33.2
OECD Average 34.3
Germany 37.6
Italy 42.9
France 45.3

Source: Revenue Statistics – OECD countries: Comparative tables. Japanese data is for 2015.

Return to report - Chart 3.3a

Chart 3.3b

Comparing the Marginal Effective Tax Rates on New Investments, Canada and the G7, 2018
Per cent
  Impact of U.S. tax reform Impact of Fall Economic Statement measures
Canada 13.8 17.0
Italy 16.7  
OECD
average
18.4  
United
States
18.7 29.8
Germany 25.1  
United
Kingdom
26.6  
France 27.7  
Japan 31.4  

Note: OECD average excludes Canada and Lithuania.
Source: Department of Finance Canada.

Return to report - Chart 3.3b

Chart 3.4a

This chart shows the evolution of global exports of goods (in trillions of U.S. dollars) and Canada's share of those exports (percent). The data are derived from the United Nations COMTRADE database and is measured on a customs basis. The chart shows that between 2000 and 2016, global exports rose from just over $US 5 trillion to over $US 15 trillion, but Canada's share of those exports declined from almost 5% to just over 2%.

Return to report - Chart 3.4a

Chart 3.4b

This chart provides a breakdown of the destination of Canadian goods exports by region in 2017. The data is derived from the United Nations COMTRADE database and is measured on a customs basis. Definitions of advanced and emerging economies were sourced from the International Monetary Fund. The chart shows that 76% of Canada's goods exports in 2017 were destined for the U.S. Exports to emerging markets represented 12%. The European Union was the destination for 7% of Canada's goods exports, while the remaining 5% was destined for other advanced economies.

Return to report - Chart 3.4b

Canada's free trade network

FTA concluded or in force

% of World GDP
62.5%
Population (Millions)
1,479

FTA in negotiations commenced

% of World GDP
6.7%
Population (Millions)
1,660

Exploratory discussions

% of World GDP
18.4%
Population (Millions)
1,969

Return to report - Canada's free trade network

Figure 3.1

Left:
Strengthening Trade Corridors to Asia and Europe
More Help for Companies Exploring New Markets
More Trade Services for Exporters

Right:
Increasing Canada's overseas exports by 50% by 2025

Return to Report - Figure 3.1

Figure 3.2

What we want to do

How we will do this

Explore making competitiveness a permanent part of regulatory mandates
Introduce an annual modernization bill to keep regulations up-to-date
Establish a dedicated External Advisory Committee on Regulatory Competitiveness
Launch a Centre for Regulatory Innovation
Enhance Government's capacity to develop and implement effective regulations
Take immediate action in response to business recommendations

Return to Report - Figure 3.2

Annex 2

Figure A2.1a

Mandate Letter Commitments (November 2015)
  Total
Completed - fully met 95
Completed - modified 2
Actions taken, progress made 157
Action taken - progress made towards ongoing goal 19
Action taken - progress made, facing challenges 13
Not being pursued 3
Completed - fully met 95
Completed - modified 2

Return to report - Figure A2.1a

Figure A2.1b

Mandate Letter Commitments: Post-November 2015
  Total
Completed - fully met 8
Actions taken, progress made 111
Action taken - progress made towards ongoing goal 9
Action taken - progress made, facing challenges 10

Return to report - Figure A2.1b

Date modified:
Report a problem on this page
Please select all that apply:

Thank you for your help!

You will not receive a reply. For enquiries, please contact us.